I was looking for information on the WGA strike and somehow came upon the article “Hollywood 2.0—Is TV Dying?” (Jan. 31).

I don’t mean to be rude, but I think you may have set a record for buying into every spin and PR angle about the “future of Hollywood.”

Is there any outlandish claim by a studio or Hollywood insider trying to appear “hip to the net” that you did not incorporate into this piece.

For instance when you write this: “The company’s stated purpose is to direct the future of film and television entertainment towards a new paradigm,” you do come across as having been paid by that company (which I’m sure isn’t the case, but you get my point).

Please apply a little bit more common sense and skepticism in the future.

*Thank you for your time*<br/>*Ren*